The prose didn't draw me in which in itself isn't an issue if I find the setting to be interesting, but I think I'm not the target for this type of dark academia book? so I didn't really find it interesting.
I think it's very curious that I hadn't really encountered a book that was half essay, half prose, and now I've encountered the format twice two months in a row (the other book is the autobiographical In the dream house)
This was a hard read, not because I wasn't interested or the prose wasn't good, but because the topic hit a bit too close to home. I even had to stop reading one day because it triggered a depersonalization episode.
The main character's delusion felt really #relatable to me, as is the topic of a mental illness that feels like a possession, a haunting, something to be exorcised in secret because nobody will believe you if you told them.
Also it just feels really good to read a book with a psychotic main character that isn't demonized, and to know that the author herself experienced psychosis and wants to shine a light on the subject with her book.
The terms "faustian hero"/"faustian bargain" have always seemed gender neutral to me, so it was interesting to look back at the time when it was only exclusively applied to male characters and how some writers then started applying Faustian tropes to female or even "third sex" characters.
I'd been meaning to get into this one for some years now and finally could get my hands on a digital copy. Very informative and easy read, made me interested in a couple of the classic books it analyzes.
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Dolor. Desidia. Violencia. Las Malas es una cucharada dura de tragar, una mirada sobre la vida de un sector de la población que sufre la indolencia de la sociedad, las consecuencias de ser excluida de la misma.
También es una mirada llena de amor y mucha nostalgia hacia esas compañeras que una vez tuvo la autora, y una mirada sobre su niñez. Pero todo el amor del mundo no nos puede salvar si hay violencia sistemica sobre nosotros, sólo podemos sobrevivir.
No sé exactamente cuál fue el criterio usado para elegir a los cuentos ganadores, pero en lo personal me sorprendió que los tres cuentos elegidos tuviesen ciertas fallas en redacción, puntuación y prosa cuando algunas de las historias no ganadoras eran de mejor calidad tanto en fondo como en forma, al punto que pensé que el orden de publicación era de la historia con más baja puntuación y terminando con el ganador.
Dicho esto, mis favoritas fueron El cuartico está igualito, Mariposa y Rebeca.
Independientemente de la calidad del resultado, se aplaude la iniciativa de publicar narrativas de autores género-diversos. También me entristece muchísimo que hoy en día sea impensable que este tipo de iniciativas se vuelvan a gestar desde el propio gobierno.