I loved the book "My Side of the Mountain" growing up, so I loved reading about the actual training of a hawk. I love Mabel and the author's descriptions of her hunting, playing, and reacting to the world. I wasn't as intrigued by the inclusion of T. H. White as a reoccurring facet of the story.
Not a series of humorous essays by a Native comedian -- instead, historical biographies and interviews and oral histories from Indigenous comedians reported on by a comedy historian. Big focus on Will Rogers and Charlie Hill, neither of whom I had heard of before, even though I am familiar with their contemporaries. I wish the histories/interviews had been organized chronologically, it was somewhat difficult to keep track of everyone (was this a revisit to an individual from a previous chapter or a one-off interview?).
I loved the method of using ideas/things to write a memoir. The personal element/frankness about mental illness drew me in. A little quote heavy at times, but Green acknowledges it.
I wanted to like this more based on the premise; similar to Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, but with people who love books. But it was poorly written--to much telling, not enough showing, especially in terms of relationships between characters.
There were too many predictable and/or unnecessary subplots; one issue was introduced at the very end just to keep everything from being wrapped up a little too neatly. The thing that bothered me the most was Autumn's death; I felt like it was shrugged off by everyone; the author creating the contest and only making it available to kids who did make it to the island felt disrespectful to her memory.
Transcriptions of interviews and speeches given by Angelia Davis.
Very introductory prison abolition text that speaks to the interconnection of the movement with other issues, but since this is several speeches on the same topic, it tends to get a little repetitive. Left me wanting to read more in-depth texts from Davis and about prison abolition.
Written more like a fictional novelization than a biography, which is distracting. The audiobook didn't contain access to his sources, which left me wondering how much was imagined by the author (especially since Beard's friend was supposed to destroy any remaining evidence of his queer life after his death). Not sure if I would have finished this if I weren't reading it as an audiobook.
Author also mentions things in passing or refers back to them without having previously mentioned them in the text. Glosses over some (deeply problematic) things that need to be better unpacked, but instead are just stated. Since Beard is touted as such an influential figure in American cooking, I was hoping the epilogue would provide more of an analysis of his complicated legacy.
Descriptions of the food are vivid; author also does a good job at demonstrated the interconnectedness of the food world at this time.