ARC provided by the publisher in exchange for an honest review. 

I can't say that this isn't a reimagining of Macbeth, but it's not what I was hoping for.

I've always had a certain fondness for Lady Macbeth as a character. She is the driving force behind Macbeth's ambition, she's cunning and manipulative, and she has so much agency in that story. With this being a version centering her, I was hoping to see all of that amped up to 11. But that's not the route the author chose to take, and unfortunately, I ended up being disappointed. I came here hoping to support women's rights but, more importantly for this particular play, women's wrongs. But instead of all the enjoyment of seeing Lady M gaslighting gatekeeping girlbossing her way to the top, I got Roscille.

Roscille (aka Lady Macbeth) is seventeen, and incredibly naïve. She thinks much of her own intelligence and cunning, but every plot she hatches throughout the story inevitably fails one way or another, because she didn't account for something. All of the agency that Lady M is supposed to have is stripped away, and rather than being the driving force in the story, Roscille is dragged along by the whims of the men around her. Where the original play has her verbally abusing Macbeth and bullying him into action, here she is submissive and timid around him. He is the one in control, and she just goes where he pushes her. I do think the last 20% of this was interesting, and the writing is beautiful as always, but this could've been a really good story if it hadn't been a Macbeth retelling. I don't think it's particularly feminist, either.

The other issue I have is the portrayal of Scots, and particularly Scottish men. In one of the first chapters, we learn that Roscille has been unjustly feared by men her entire life. They call her a witch because she has strange eyes, when there's no evidence to support this. But instead of her then acknowledging that people have prejudices and that they are usually unfounded, she states with confidence that Scots are brutes, that the men all rape women, and more along those lines. I can acknowledge that, based on the time period and the prejudices running rampant, this could have been her opinion, but it could also have been challenged within the narrative by the author, which doesn't happen. From their first meeting, she's deathly afraid of Macbeth, to the point that she tries to arrange his downfall before he has even shown himself to be anything, brute or not. And the story supports her conclusions, in the end, but she couldn't have known that initially. To be clear, it's not just Macbeth who is portrayed this way. All the Scottish men surrounding her are bad, except for one—Lisander, the half Scottish/half British son of Duncane. This painting of Brits as better than Scots felt problematic to me, especially because there is still a lot of prejudice against Scottish men.

Also, the author seems to be promising dragonfucking in this book, so just to spare people the disappointment: it's not in dragon form.