You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

spookysoto's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Rating: I liked it

samvdp's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark funny reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

untitledlex's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny informative lighthearted reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Hilarious read. Surprising the book was written nearly 100 years and is still so relevant. Must read!

avalin1's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

tracithomas's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Super smart. Loved the content and idea. Didn’t love the writing. The humor did g translate for me 80 years on. Still relevant as far as the topic and conversations.

kpleits's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I always enjoy a satirical science fiction book.

qfromimpracticaljokers's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix

3.75

domigaet's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

versaties's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional funny informative reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

underapileofbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I really liked the concept behind this book, and it's sadly still relevant almost 100 years after its initial publication. That said, I feel like it would have been stronger if the story had stayed more focused. By the end, there were quite a lot of characters to keep track of as well as a lot of political machinations to follow (both in terms of actual politics as well as social organizations scrambling to stay relevant). I think it could have made its major points in half the length, but it was certainly a thought-provoking read.